Transparency Report
30 September 2024
This Transparency Report by Buzzacott LLP (“Buzzacott” or “the Firm”) for the year ended 30 September 2024 has been prepared having regard to the Transparency Reporting requirements set out in The Statutory Auditors (Transparency) Instrument 2008. These requirements were drawn from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) No.537/2014 and the amended Directive 2014/56/EU and, following the UK’s exit from the European Union, have been retained as a requirement for audit firms which audit public interest entities (“PIEs”). The Firm has not issued an audit report on any PIEs during the year ended 30 September 2024 and therefore this Transparency Report is not required by UK law. The Firm’s Transparency Report has therefore been prepared having regard to the above requirements (referred to here as “the transparency regulations”) as a framework only.
1. Legal structure and ownership
Buzzacott LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales and is owned and controlled by a subset of its members who have voting rights in the LLP (the firm’s “Equity Partners”). As at 30 September 2024, there were 22 Equity Partners. The Firm operates from a single office in London.
2. PrimeGlobal
The Firm is a member of PrimeGlobal, an association of independent accounting firms, composed of more than 300 independent public accounting firms in over 100 countries. PrimeGlobal provides its independent member firms with tools and resources to help them furnish superior accounting, auditing, tax and management services to clients around the globe. Through PrimeGlobal connections, independent member firms offer the strength and capabilities of a large, worldwide organisation with technical depth and geographic reach impossible for a local firm alone.There is no common control, ownership or strategy across the PrimeGlobal member firms, and PrimeGlobal is not aimed at cost or profit sharing across its members. Therefore, PrimeGlobal is not a ‘network’ as defined in the transparency regulations.
3. Governance structure
The leadership of the Firm is the responsibility of the Managing Partner. The governance and committee structure of the Firm is as follows:
Governance and Committee Structure
Terms of Reference for key governance committees.
| Committee | Executive Committee |
| Frequency of Meetings | Monthly |
| Purpose | Overall management of the Firm and monitoring of performance |
| Membership | Managing Partner and Executive Partners, with heads of support teams in attendance |
| Chair | Chair is appointed by the Executive Committee |
| Committee | Equity Partners |
| Frequency of Meetings | Bi-monthly |
| Purpose | Overall strategy of the Firm and major partnership decisions |
| Membership | Equity Partners |
| Committee | Equity Committee |
| Frequency of Meetings | As required |
| Purpose | To recommend Equity Partner remuneration and distribution of equity |
| Membership | Membership is made up of three elected Equity Partners who each serve for three years on rotation, with a new member joining each year. The Managing Partner attends as an ex officio member. |
| Chair | The longest serving member acts as Chair |
| Committee | Audit Committee |
| Frequency of Meetings | Four times per year |
| Purpose | To oversee the relationship with the Firm’s auditors and to liaise with the auditors on behalf of the Equity Partners. Specific responsibilities include communicating with the auditors in the role of “those charged with governance” and reporting to the Equity Partners on all matters relating to year end statutory reports and accounts, including the audit of all group entities. |
| Membership | Membership is made up of two Equity Partners, one of whom is a member of the Executive Committee, with the Managing Partner and Finance Partner in attendance. |
| Chair | Audit Compliance Principal |
4. Internal quality control systems (audit)
In respect of its audit services, Buzzacott has implemented a number of internal quality control systems to ensure that our high standards are maintained. The Firm keeps an Audit Quality Action Plan to facilitate our aim to maintain and improve audit quality.
Audit compliance
During the year the Firm was required to comply with the International Standard on Quality Management (UK) 1 and International Standard on Quality Management (UK) 2.The Firm’s Audit Compliance Principal, for the purposes of complying with Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) regulations, is required to ensure that the Firm has complied, and will continue to comply, with Audit Regulations. He is also the first point of contact with the ICAEW.The Firm has an Audit Procedures Manual which sets out in detail the audit procedures which must be followed. This manual is available to all staff involved in audit assignments and regular training is provided to ensure compliance.
File reviews
All audit files are reviewed by a manager and the Senior Statutory Auditor (SSA)/Responsible Individual (RI) throughout the audit process, including at both the planning and the completion stages.The Firm also maintains an Audit Quality Management Manual which sets out requirements for an Engagement Quality Review (‘EQR’) for certain assignments, including audits of public interest entities, if any, and audits where such a review is required by laws or regulations.The Audit Quality Management Manual also sets out the requirements for a second RI ‘hot review’ of audits of financial statements in certain other circumstances where the risk is elevated.EQR reviews and hot reviews must be completed, and any points raised must be resolved, before approval of the audit report.Details of the precise criteria which require the performance of an EQR or hot review are established by the Firm’s Audit & Assurance Technical Committee.Cold file reviews of the Firm’s audits are performed on a regular basis, ensuring each SSA/RI’s work is reviewed at least annually. These cold file reviews are performed independently by representatives of the Firm’s external compliance consultants. Detailed reports are provided to the Audit & Assurance Technical Committee and remedial and follow-up action is taken if necessary.
Statement on the effectiveness of the internal quality management system
The Firm’s management considers that the internal quality management system is functioning at a suitable level of effectiveness to enable us to maintain our internal quality standards and comply with our professional and legal requirements.
5. External monitoring
The Firm is subject to cyclical external monitoring by the Quality Assurance Department (QAD) of the ICAEW. The Firm’s last audit QAD review was completed in 2024. A Practice Assurance review was also performed by the QAD in 2024.
6. Independence procedures and ethical requirements
The Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC’s) Ethical Standard provides regulations and guidance on possible threats to integrity, objectivity and independence in the conduct of audit engagements as well as on potential safeguards which may be implemented to counteract those threats.In respect of its responsibility as the regulatory body for auditors in England and Wales, with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland, the ICAEW publishes rules under which auditors will be regulated: the Audit Regulations.The Firm’s policies are consistent with these requirements and, in respect of audit services, are contained in the Firm’s Ethics Handbook (which all staff must follow) and the Firm’s Audit Quality Management Manual (which all audit staff must follow).
Within Buzzacott
Within the Firm, overall responsibility for compliance with the Audit Regulations rests with a partner designated as Audit Compliance Principal as described above. In accordance with the Ethical Standard, an Ethics Partner has also been appointed.Members of staff are made aware of ethical considerations on commencement of their employment and on regular courses which are provided both internally and by the Firm’s external compliance consultants.All partners and staff complete an annual declaration of their independence and must notify the Firm of any circumstances which may affect their independence, or of any potential or actual conflicts of interest.
Acceptance of clients and engagements
Before accepting a new audit appointment, or before engaging to perform an additional service for an audit client, the SSA/RI must approve and document the decision to accept the appointment. In doing so the SSA/RI will consider (amongst other areas) independence, ethics and risk issues, the Firm’s expertise, values and resources, its ability to carry out the work and the Firm’s anti-money laundering procedures.
Monitoring
An internal review of independence practices is included in the Annual Audit Compliance Review which is conducted by the Firm’s external compliance consultants. The Firm’s management confirms that the Annual Audit Compliance Review has been conducted in the year under review.A formal report is made by the Firm’s external compliance consultants to the Firm’s Audit & Assurance Technical Committee and any points arising are the subject of action points which form part of the Firm’s Audit Quality Action Plan.
7. Continuing professional development
All SSAs/RIs in the Firm are members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) and/or the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA). All members must undertake Continuing Professional Development (CPD) to ensure that they maintain their skills and knowledge and all SSAs/RIs must undertake additional CPD to comply with the International Accounting Education Standards Board’s International Education Standard 8 Professional Competence for Engagement Partners Responsible for Audits of Financial Statements and, from 1 November 2023, the Continuing Professional Development Regulations 2023.Close monitoring of CPD is performed by the Firm for all qualified members of staff. This ensures that all persons in the Firm who are eligible to be appointed as an SSA/RI maintain their technical knowledge, professional skills and values at a sufficiently high level.
8. Partner remuneration
Each Equity Partner is subject to a performance review with the Managing Partner and Equity Partners are remunerated according to a number of factors including those arising from this review.The Firm considers that no partner remuneration is contingent upon any basis that would compromise the independence of any audit, including the sale of non-audit services.
9. Audit partner and key audit staff rotation
The Firm complies with the audit partner and key audit staff rotation requirements of the FRC’s Ethical Standard.The Firm’s Audit Quality Management Manual sets out the circumstances in which the engagement partner, engagement quality reviewers and other key partners and staff involved in recurring engagements must be rotated away from a recurring audit engagement.The Firm monitors the length of time and extent of involvement that partners and staff in senior positions serve as members of the engagement teams for recurring audit engagements.Where an audit engagement partner has held this role for a continuous period of more than ten years and the FRC’s Ethical Standard or the Firm’s Audit Quality Management Manual does not require partner rotation, safeguards are applied to ensure independence is maintained. These safeguards are communicated to those charged with governance of the audited entity.
10. Financial information
The transparency regulations require financial information to be provided which shows the importance of statutory audit work to the Firm.
| Year ended 30 September 2024£m (unaudited) | Year ended 30 September 2023£m | |
| Statutory audit services provided to:public-interest entities* other entities | -25.2 | -20.6 |
| Non-audit services to audit clients | 9.2 | 6.2 |
| Non-audit services to non-audit clients | 49.6 | 45.1 |
| Total revenue | 84.0 | 71.9 |
*Revenues from the statutory audit of annual and consolidated financial statements of public-interest entities and entities belonging to a group of undertakings whose parent undertaking is a public-interest entity. The Firm’s revenues from non-audit services to audit clients include those for accounts preparation work for unlisted clients, corporation tax work, tax planning, payroll and other outsourced services and general business advice.
Buzzacott LLP
21 January 2025
Appendix 1
Public interest entities
The Firm did not carry out a statutory audit for a public-interest entity in the year ended 30 September 2024.(Note that the Firm did receive revenues in the year from the statutory audit of annual or consolidated financial statements of entities belonging to a group of undertakings whose parent undertaking is a public-interest entity, however the aggregate of these fees is too low to be disclosed in the above table).
Appendix 2
Major local audits
The Firm has not issued any audit reports in respect of major local audits during the year ended 30 September 2024 and therefore the Firm is not required to comply with The Local Auditors (Transparency) Regulations 2020.
